Relevance Of The “Contiguity†Doctrine To International Territorial Disputes, Including The Spratly Islands Dispute
Abstract
In the nineteenth century, unappropriated territories were sometimes claimed on the basis of geographical proximity, i.e. contiguity, or territorial propinquity, the idea being that a state which is closet to the territory in question should have title. In Africa the colonial powers employed the hinterland doctrine to explain this basis of claim during the late nineteenth century. Their argument was that a state occupying a coastral strip was entitled to an unspecified portion of the hinterland.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2019-01-14
How to Cite
Sharma, S. P. (2019). Relevance Of The “Contiguity†Doctrine To International Territorial Disputes, Including The Spratly Islands Dispute. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 19(1 and 2), 81–98. Retrieved from https://jati.um.edu.my/index.php/JMCL/article/view/16054
Issue
Section
Articles