Main Article Content

Khairul Azman Mohamad Suhaimy
Nurul Aimi Razali
Lutfan Jaes
Muhamad Helmy Sabtu
Muhammad Fuad Othman
Mohamad Ainuddin Iskandar Lee Abdullah
Mohd. Shukri Hanapi


In the administration and development of the Malaysian nation-state, each prime minister has contributed and exhibited his distinct leadership style. Abdul Razak Hussein and Mahathir Mohamad’s contributions and leadership, especially in the nation-state’s development and modernisation, are well-recognised by Malaysians. They referred to Razak as the Development Father while Mahathir is known as the Father of Modernisation. Their leaderships’ effectiveness is also evident in their outstanding achievements based on the policies and actions during their tenure as the nation’s leaders. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the achievement-oriented aspects of Razak-Mahathir leadership in Malaysia’s nation-state development. A qualitative historical descriptive design was used as the research methodology where the primary source of this study was the texts of the two prime ministers’ speeches. These sources are qualitatively analysed to explore the qualities of leadership they practised to develop and modernise the country. The results showed that leadership qualities such as stimulating people’s intellectual capacity, motivating people, good planning, demonstrating influence, emphasising togetherness, emphasising good values, exhibiting firmness, demonstrating self-confidence, being considerate, envisioning the future and acknowledging people’s contribution were practised by Razak and Mahathir in conducting their duties as prime ministers. It showed that a country can achieve remarkable development and modernisation when it is led by leaders who incorporate the aforementioned leadership qualities. This study’s social implications are as follows: first, underlining the importance of achievement-oriented leadership that can inspire the people and the government to foster a steady national development and secondly, implying the essential roles of leaders in defining and shaping a suitable nation-state concept that should be adopted in a nation-state. This study innovatively introduces a leadership model framework based on Razak-Mahathir’s achievements during their administration. It gives an overview of their successful leadership styles in governing the country, which can be applied or practised by leaders or related parties with similar roles, aspirations and goals.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Author Biography

Muhamad Helmy Sabtu, Centre for General Studies and Co-Curricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

PhD Candidate at Centre for General Studies and Co-Curricular, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.


Abdullah, W. J. (2019). The Mahathir effect in Malaysia’s 2018 election: The role of credible personalities in regime transitions. Democratisation, 26(3), 521-536.

Alqahtani, K. (2020, October 19). Concept of success through transformational leader on governmental organization performance in the Kingdom of Bahrain: A multiple case study approach. Retrieved from

Arifin, F. M., & Othman, N. (2018). The dynamic of policymaking process in Malaysia. International Journal of West Asian Studies, 10(1), 74-84.

Baharuddin, S. A. (1990). Masyarakat Malaysia yang membangun. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Basri, A. F., Ahmad, A. H., & Aziz, A. R. (Ed.). (1987). Isu-isu perpaduan nasional: Cabaran, pencapaian & masa depan. Sintok: Sekolah Pengajian Asasi Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Beng, O. K. (2006). Mahathir as Muslim leader. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2006(1), 172-180.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Bunnell, T., Barter, P. A., & Morshidi, S. (2002). Kuala Lumpur metropolitan area: A globalising city–region. Cities, 19(5), 357-370.

Cheah, J. L. S., & Ahmad, M. K. (2017). Confucian value-based leadership communication: A study on Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(3), 140-156.

Cheah, J. L. S., Yusof, N., & Ahmad, M. K. (2017). Tun Dr. Mahathir’s Leadership Communication: The Confucian Perspective. SHS Web of Conferences, 33.

Danto, E. A. (2008). Historical research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Embong, A. E. (2001). Negara bangsa: Proses dan perbahasan [Nation state: Processes and debates]. Bangi: Penerbit UKM.

Embong, A. R., Hassan, H., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2016). The representations of leadership by example in editorial cartoons. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32(1), 625-650.

Haggard, S. (2000). The politics of the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 130-144.

Hussin, R. (1999). Teori pergantungan dan cabaran wawasan Malaysia 2020. Jurnal Kinabalu, 5, 100-134.

Ibrahim, R. (2007). Multiculturalism and education in Malaysia. Culture and Religion, 8(2), 155-167.

Jackson, S., & Mosco, V. (1999). The political economy of new: technological spaces: Malaysia’s Multimedia Super Corridor. Journal of International Communication, 6(1), 22-40.

Jaes, L. (2017). Akal budi tempatan dalam pengurusan pembangunan oleh Soeharto, Mahathir dan Lee Kuan Yew (Ph.D. thesis), Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia.

Jomo, K. S., & Sundaram, J. K. (2004). The new economic policy and interethnic relations in Malaysia. Geneva: UNRISD.

Jonas, A. E., & Wilson, D. (2018). The nation-state and the city: Introduction to a debate. Urban Geography, 39(9), 1418-1420.

Khattab, U. (2004). Wawasan 2020: Engineering a modern Malay(sia) state campaigns and minority stakes. Media Asia, 31(3), 170-177.

Lovelace, J. B., Neely, B. H., Allen, J. B., & Hunter, S. T. (2019). Charismatic, ideological, & pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership: A critical review and agenda for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 96-110.

Liu, H., Dust, S. B., Xu, M., & Ji, Y. (2021). Leader–follower risk orientation incongruence, intellectual stimulation, and creativity: A configurational approach. Personnel Psychology, 74(1), 143-173.

McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117.

Mcdowell, B. (2013). Historical research: A guide for writers of dissertations, theses, articles and books. Abingdon: Routledge.

Othman, M. R. (2006). Sejarah pembinaan negara bangsa. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Mohamad, M. (1996). Islam-the misunderstood religion. JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2, 1-10.

Mohamad, M. (2012). Doktor umum: Memoir Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Petaling Jaya: MPH Group Publishing.

Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of management review, 5(4), 491-500.

Nathan, K. S. (1995). Vision 2020 and Malaysian foreign policy: Strategic evolution and the Mahathir impact. Southeast Asian Affairs, 22, 220-237.

National Archives of Malaysia. (2019, November 25). Tun Razak, catalyst of people/national development. Retrieved from

Nik Mahmud, N. A., Salleh, M., Harun, A. G. (2011). Biografi Tun Abdul Razak: Negarawan dan patriot. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Osborne, T. (2018). Treaty of Westphalia/Peace of Münster (1648). The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy, 1-9.

Raj, P., Wahab, S. A., Osman, S. I. W., Zawawi, N. M., & Fazal, S. A. (2018). Sustainable Development and Innovation: Reviewing the Concept and Malaysian Participation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 1212-1226.

Rohman, M. A., & Sabri, A. Z. S. A. (2017). Kempen “Kepimpinan melalui Teladan” semasa era pemerintahan Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad di Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 9(2), 15-23.

Rudner, M. (1977). Education, development and change in Malaysia. Japanese Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15(1), 23-62.

Sendjaya, S., Pekerti, A., Härtel, C., Hirst, G., & Butarbutar, I. (2016). Are authentic leaders always moral? The role of Machiavellianism in the relationship between authentic leadership and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 125-139.

Suhaimy, K. A. M. (2009). Pemikiran pembangunan berteraskan system nilai budaya: Kajian terhadap pendekatan Dr. Mahathir

Mohamad 1981-1986 (Ph.D. thesis), Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia.

Sundaram, J. K., & Cheek, A. S. (1988). The politics of Malaysia’s Islamic resurgence. Third World Quarterly, 10(2), 843-868.

Suppiah, S. M., Ahmad, M. K., & Gunasekaran, H. N. (2018). Mahathir’s leadership communication: Exploring the Indians’ community experience. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(2), 205-222.

Taylor, R. D. (2003). The Malaysia experience: The multimedia super corridor. In M. Jussawalla & R.D Taylor (Eds.), Information technology parks of the Asia Pacific: Lessons for the regional digital divide (pp. 64-118). New York: M.E Sharpe.

van Houwelingen, G., van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2015). Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers’ moral transgressions are determined by construal level mindset. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 878-891.

Welsh, B. (2005). Malaysia in 2004: Out of Mahathir’s Shadow? Asian Survey, 45(1), 153-160.