Journal publication process is a professional academic activity and should be encouraged. 

JATI'S REVIEW PROCESS
JATI is practising a double-blind peer-review process whereby the author(s) do not know the reviewer(s), and the reviewer(s) also do not know the author(s). Peer review is fundamental to the scientific publication process. 

QUALITY OF THE PAPER
Authors are considered experts by JATI in related topics addressed in the papers they write.    

The Editor-in-Chief will observe and ensure the quality and the performance of the writers to ensure the high quality of performance of the journal. This assessment will assist the JATI Board of Editors in allowing the writers to continue publishing the paper in this journal.  

Therefore, the most valuable and helpful reports will assist the authors in improving the quality of their papers.  The reviewed article with arguments by the reviewers is always more useful to the authors to enrich and strengthen their paper for publication.  


PUBLICATION ETHICS AND CONFIDENTIALITY
The authors are responsible for ensuring that they have written entirely original works and, if the authors have used the work and words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

The Journal editors and reviewers will detect plagiarism in the papers submitted to JATI.  The reviewers may notify or report to the Editor-in-Chief if they suspect the author's misconduct or plagiarism by the author(s) without publicly announcing it. Reviewers must keep confidential all information about the submitted paper(s) to keep the author(s) and the article safely publishing their research output.

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS

  1. Authors should be aware of the aims and scope of the journal to evaluate whether the paper is fit for this journal; which the aims and scope of the journal are as follows:

The aims are to bridge and connect the gap between scholarships in the multi-discipline studies on Southeast Asian region and global in any social sciences and humanities theme and issues.

And the scope of JATI broadly focuses on the research result on Social Sciences and Humanities related to Southeast Asia, which seeks to promote critical analysis of inter-related issues within this geographical area of economy, political, social, art and cultural issues.

  1. JATI requested submitted papers to be indicated with the theoretical/Conceptual.  The author should review previous research or theories. The theory, if any, should be relevant and discussed throughout the paper. 
  1. The paper should explain clearly the methodology, whether a systematic and coherent method should follow qualitative or quantitative empirical studies. Therefore, the reviewers are required to review the paper following the convention of a research paper, which includes clear abstract (with keywords), introduction (should discuss or highlight the problem statement, research questions and objectives), literature review, theoretical and conceptual framework, methodology, result (findings, analysis and discussions), conclusion and recommendations. It is followed by acknowledgement and references (APA latest version). 
  1. The reviewers should justify the paper's contribution in a few aspects, such as contribution to advance knowledge in the discipline, the implication of the findings, and attraction to other people, researchers, or policymakers for further research and application. 
  1. The article should show its capability in communication, which is adequate in terms of language efficiency, clarity and coherence. The paper should be easy to understand and follow the logical format, good data presentation, points, tables, figures, graphs, etc. 

TEMPLATE OF THE PAPER FOR AUTHORS

  1. SUITABILITY OF THE TITLE, ABSTRACT AND KEYWORDS

The title should represent the Southeast Asian region or country studies. A case study is not a priority.

Abstract- Should consist of 4 important elements:

  • The research focus (i.e. statement of the problem(s)/research issue(s) addressed);
  • The research methods (experimental research, case studies, questionnaires, etc.);
  • The results/findings of the research; and
  • The main conclusions and recommendations

Keywords: right keywords for the entire discourse of the paper

  1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

An introduction is the initial part of a research paper and the part that a reader will likely read first (at least when focusing deeply and reading your article in detail). ... The introduction of writing is going to set out your rationale, which is what research will be based around

The background of the study will provide context to the information discussed throughout the research paper. Background information may include both important and relevant studies. This is particularly important if a study either supports or refutes the thesis.

The background of the study will discuss the problem statement, rationale, and research questions. It links an introduction to the research topic and ensures a logical flow of ideas.  Thus, it helps readers understand the reasons for conducting the study.

  1. LITERATURE REVIEW/THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Literature sufficiently reviewed?

A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works about the research problem being investigated.

The summary of previous investigations leads to an understanding of current research and its relevance and provides an overall understanding of the literature’s contribution to scholarship.

  1. METHODOLOGY

The methodology should be sufficiently described and use a suitable methodology. 

  1. ANALYSIS

Data analysis supporting the findings

  1. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS

Appropriateness of presentation of findings

  1. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Restate the topic. The author should briefly restate the topic and explain why it is important. ...
  • Restate the thesis. ...
  • Briefly summarise the main points. ...
  • Add the points up. ...
  • Make a call to action when appropriate. ...
  • Answer the “so what” question.

*make sure to revisit the theoretical framework, objectives, and findings and connect them in the conclusion. 

  1. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Please include the individuals and organisations that contributed to the research by having the names, research grant titles and the grant number(s).

  1. CITATIONS AND REFERENCES

JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies follows the APA (American Psychological Association) style to cite various sources. This APA Citation Guide, revised according to the 6th edition of the APA manual, provides the general format for in-text citations and the reference page. For more guidance, please refer to the American Psychological Association Publication Manual (7th ed.).

Please do not include footnotes or endnotes in the manuscript. All citations must be referred to the references list, and please do not include the references which did not cite in the text or manuscript. 

  1. TECHNICAL

Please indicate all figures, maps, charts, tables, diagrams, etc., accordingly. Please number all of them, which must be reflected in the text or discussion. Please indicate the source(s) at the bottom of the maps, charts, tables, diagrams, etc.

Font type: Palatino-Linotype and font size 10.5.

Paper size: 6.75 inch (width), 9.65 inch (high)

Length of the paper: minimum: 6,000 words: maximum: 8,000 words (excludes references).

  1. LANGUAGE

The language style used for publication in this JATI is standard English. Grammar, diction, and sentence structure do or do not impede the reading.

 The third reader or editor should edit it before submitting it to the journal for review.  All accepted articles must be edited by the professional editor(s). All authors are responsible for managing the copy-editing manuscript with the suggested professional editor(s).  

 

Prepared by
Prof. Dr Hanafi Hussin
Editor-in-Chief, JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies